Defending Credit Hire Claims: A Step-by-Step Guide for Insurers in Ireland

 

Credit hire claims – where a claimant hires a replacement vehicle on credit after an accident – remain relatively uncommon in the Republic of Ireland, though they volume of these claims is undoubtedly growing. Insurers in Ireland must be vigilant and prepared. A structured, proactive defence can save costs and minimise exposure. Credit hire cases often involve large daily charges that accumulate quickly, so early intervention is crucial.

Below is a detailed, step-by-step guide to defending credit hire claims in Ireland.


Step 1: Early Identification and Referral

  • Identify potential credit hire claims immediately – at the first notice of loss (FNOL) or during initial discussions with the claimant or their representatives.
  • Refer the case internally to a dedicated credit hire handler or team trained to manage such claims.  Early specialist involvement means the claim is defensively handled from the outset and early identification prevents costs from spiralling if the case ends up in litigation.
  • Request key details without delay:
    • The circumstances of the accident to investigate liabilty quickly.
    • The daily rate of hire and type of vehicle being hired.  This will give some idea of quantum.
    • The initial repair estimate or motor assessor’s report relating to the damage.
  • Obtain a desktop engineering report by forwarding the estimate to an independent engineer.
  • If the engineer recommends inspection, arrange inspection facilities quickly.
  • If no inspection is required, confirm this in writing to bring any ongoing storage costs to an end.
  • If the vehicle is repairable, request updates on:
    • Repair progress.
    • Anticipated delays (e.g. due to the current global parts shortage).
    • Offer assistance sourcing parts, if possible.
  • If the vehicle is a total loss, the plaintiff will typically seek the pre-accident value less any salvage.
    • Raise the payment promptly, ideally by bank transfer, to avoid prolonged hire.

🛠️ Why this matters: Credit hire is a continuing cost. Fast, coordinated action at this early stage helps limit duration and mitigate unnecessary expense.


Step 2: Use of Intervention Letters

  • Copley v Lawn: This is a UK case which confirms the position on letters from insurers offering their own services.  If the case is litigated, Defence practitioners can suggest that in refusing the services, they failed to mitigate their own losses.
  • A valid intervention letter (offering a replacement vehicle) must clearly state the cost to the insurer. If the offer is vague or threatening in tone, it will likely be considered non-compliant, and the claimant cannot be criticised for refusing it.
  • Mitigation of damages: A valid intervention letter allows insurers to argue the claimant had access to a cheaper alternative. Even if rejected, the insurer may only be liable for Basic Hire Rate (BHR)—if they can show what a reasonable alternative would have cost.
  • Timing: Courts are fairly strict and so it is key that the letter is sent at FNOL stage before hire begins.
  • Tone and clarity: The offer must be:
    • Reasonably drafted and ‘copley’ compliant
    • Non-aggressive.
    • Clearly priced.
  • Practical tip: Always issue intervention letters early and retain proof of delivery.  Insurers are now considering new and practical means of delivery such as email, texts and even a bouquet of flowers!

✉️ Well-drafted intervention letters are a practical, court-recognised tool for controlling credit hire exposure from the outset.


Step 3: Challenge the Claimant’s Need

  • The claimant has the burden of proving they required a hire car due to the accident.
  • The insurer can rebut this by showing:
    • Access to another vehicle.
    • Use of a courtesy car from their own insurer.
    • Alternative transport (e.g. public transit) was reasonably available.

🚗 Example: If the claimant had a motor trade policy, they may have had a access to a number of vehicles and insurers should query whether they had another working car they could use, then a credit hire may be deemed unnecessary.


Step 4: Assess the Reasonableness of the Hire

4.1 Duration

  • Was the length of hire proportionate to the repair duration?
  • Were there delays that could have been avoided or reduced?

4.2 Type of Vehicle

  • Was the hire vehicle a ‘like for like’ replacement, based on the size and specification of the original?

4.3 Rates

  • Are the hire charges in line with local market rates?  Insurers often instruct a Basic Hire Rate (BHR) report, which surveys high-street providers for like-for-like vehicles in the area. In one case defended by our office in Letterkenny, Ireland, a BHR report showed that an alternative car was available at about half the cost of the credit hire vehicle
  • Could similar vehicles have been hired at a lower cost?

4.4 Duty to Mitigate

  • Did the claimant take steps to limit their loss?
    • Prompt returning of hire vehicle after repairs.
    • Willingness to consider other a lesser vehicle.

⚖️ Reasonableness is judged case by case—but insurers can often limit exposure by carefully documenting excesses in rate or duration.


Step 5: Explore Specific Defenses

5.1 Impecuniosity

  • If the claimant couldn’t afford to pay upfront without making unreasonable sacrifices, a credit hire is generally accepted.
  • However, this isn’t a complete defense—insurers can still challenge need, rate and duration.

5.2 Illegality

  • If the Plaintiff’s original vehicle did not have a valid NCT certificate, valid insurance or Tax, an argument of illegality can be made.

5.3 Misrepresentation

  • If the hire company misled the claimant (e.g. pretending it was a “free courtesy car”), the agreement may be void or voidable.

5.4 Enforceability

  • Review the terms of the hire agreement carefully.
  • Clauses related to cancellation, payment obligation, and dispute resolution may be grounds for challenge.

Final Thoughts on Credit Hire Claims  in Ireland

A successful credit hire defense rests on:

  • Quick action and early internal referral.
  • Use of valid intervention letters to reduce potential liability.
  • Challenging the necessity, duration, and cost of hire.
  • Exploring legal technicalities of the hire agreement for further leverage.

🧠 Insurers who are proactive—not reactive—control the narrative and reduce exposure.


Training for Insurers

Ruaidhrí Austin, Partner at Lacey Solicitors, regularly delivers training sessions to insurers across Ireland on the evolving legal and procedural landscape of credit hire claims. These sessions are available both in person and online, tailored to claims teams, legal departments, or senior handlers.

If your team would benefit from a practical, up-to-date session on defending credit hire claims, please use the Contact Us section of our website to arrange a training session.

Dog Bite Claims in Northern Ireland – Get the Compensation You Deserve

Dog bite claims in Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland are undoubtedly on the rise.  If you or a loved one has been bitten by a dog in Northern Ireland, you may be entitled to compensation for your injuries. At Lacey Solicitors, we are recognised as leading personal injury and insurance lawyers, and we have extensive experience helping victims of dog attacks secure the compensation they deserve.


Rise in Dog Attacks Across Northern Ireland

Dog bite incidents are becoming more common across the UK and Northern Ireland. A significant rise in attacks has been attributed to unsocialised “pandemic puppies”—dogs acquired during the COVID-19 lockdown period with limited exposure to other people and animals.

In fact, Northern Ireland ranks as the third worst area in the UK for dog attacks on postal workers, with nearly 50 incidents recorded between 2020 and 2021. And this doesn’t even include attacks that resulted in GP visits or unreported incidents.

The increasing number of serious injuries—including those suffered by children, postal workers, tradespeople, and pedestrians—is deeply concerning. At Lacey Solicitors, we understand the physical and psychological toll of such injuries and are committed to helping victims through every stage of the legal process.


What Are Your Legal Rights After a Dog Bite?

In Northern Ireland, the law is clear. Under the Dogs (Northern Ireland) Order 1983, the keeper of a dog (not just the owner) is civilly and criminally liable if the dog attacks another person. If you’ve been bitten, you can bring a claim for damages—even if:

  • The dog had never attacked anyone before

  • The dog was on a lead

  • The attack took place in a public or private space

  • The dog did not bite but caused injury by knocking you over

It is also important to know that a dog does not have to bite to create liability. If the dog’s behaviour caused fear or led to an accident (e.g., knocking someone down or causing a road traffic accident), the keeper may still be held responsible.


Common Defences to Dog Bite Claims

There are a few defences a dog keeper might raise, such as:

  • The injured party provoked the dog

  • The injured party was negligent (e.g., approaching the dog unsafely)

  • The dog was under the control of another responsible person at the time as seen in th 1987 Northern Ireland case of Morrison v Miller.

For example, in the Northern Ireland case Neeson v Acheson (2008), a claimant who was bitten on the face received £6,000 in compensation, reduced by £2,000 due to her own contributory negligence.  The court found that Acheson was liable under the statute as the keeper of the dog, but also considered contributory negligence on Neeson’s part.Despite Neeson’s familiarity with the dog, her action of putting her face close to the dog was deemed foolish, contributing to the incident. The court concluded that the primary cause of the injuries was the unexpected reaction of the dog.


Types of Dog Attack Claims We Handle

At Lacey Solicitors, we represent clients in a wide range of dog-related injury cases, including:

  • Bites and lacerations

  • Facial and bodily scarring

  • Fractures caused by being knocked over

  • Psychological trauma and dog phobia

  • Injuries to children

  • Dog attacks on workers, including postal and delivery staff


How Much Compensation Can I Claim for a Dog Bite Claim in Northern Ireland?

Compensation for a dog bite in Northern Ireland is typically calculated using the Green Book—the official guidelines for personal injury matters in Northern Ireland. The value of your claim will depend on:

  • The severity of your injuries (physical and psychological)

  • Any permanent scarring (especially to the face)

  • Medical expenses (past and future)

  • Loss of earnings

  • Care costs

  • Travel and rehabilitation expenses

At Lacey Solicitors, we work tirelessly to ensure every aspect of your loss is accounted for and that you receive maximum compensation.


What Should You Do After a Dog Attack?

If you or someone you know has been bitten by a dog, take the following steps:

  1. Seek immediate medical attention

  2. Obtain the contact details of the dog’s owner or keeper

  3. Take photographs of your injuries, the dog, and the scene

  4. Report the incident to the police

  5. Get contact details for any witnesses

  6. Record your version of events while it is fresh in your mind

  7. Contact Lacey Solicitors for legal advice


Do I Have a Time Limit to Claim?

Yes. In Northern Ireland, you typically have three years from the date of the incident to bring a personal injury claim. For children, the three-year time limit begins when they turn 18.


Frequently Asked Questions about Dog Bite Claims in Northern Ireland

 

Can I claim if the dog was on a lead?

Yes. Being on a lead does not remove the owner’s responsibility if the dog bites or causes harm.

What if I was knocked down but not bitten?

You may still be entitled to compensation. Injuries caused by a dog’s behaviour—even without a bite—can form the basis of a claim.

Is the owner liable if the dog has never bitten before?

Yes. There is no requirement for the dog to have a history of aggression.

Can I claim if I was working when the dog bit me?

Yes. Workers such as postal staff, carers, and delivery drivers are among the most frequently injured by dogs. You can bring a claim even if you were on private property.

Will home insurance cover my claim?

In many cases, the dog owner’s home insurance policy may cover the claim. We will investigate all available insurance options when handling your case.


Why Choose Lacey Solicitors for Dog Bite Claims in Northern Ireland?

Lacey Solicitors are trusted experts in insurance and personal injury law across Northern Ireland. We provide:

  • Specialist legal advice from experienced solicitors

  • Clear and compassionate communication throughout your case

  • A no-nonsense approach to recovering compensation quickly and effectively

  • Support in gathering evidence and dealing with insurers

  • Representation in court if required

You don’t have to suffer in silence. If you’ve been injured by a dog, we are here to help.


Contact Lacey Solicitors Today

To speak with a member of our dedicated personal injury team, call us today on 028 90896540 or email info@laceysolicitors.com. Alternatively, you can fill out our online enquiry form and a solicitor will contact you shortly.

Let Lacey Solicitors help you secure the compensation you deserve.

 

NI Cycling Accidents Increase in Summer

As the weather improves, more cyclists take to the roads across Northern Ireland, especially in cities like Belfast. Unfortunately, the warmer months also bring a significant rise in cycling accidents. If you or a loved one has been involved in a bicycle accident, it’s important to know your rights and how to pursue a personal injury claim.

Recent statistics show a worrying increase in cycling-related injuries across Northern Ireland, with numbers returning to pre-pandemic levels by 2023. Despite the growing popularity of cycling for commuting and recreation, local roads remain among the most dangerous for vulnerable road users like cyclists and pedestrians.

Unlike drivers, cyclists lack proper physical protection. As a result, they are more likely to suffer serious injuries in the event of a road traffic accident.

At Lacey Solicitors, our experienced cycling accident solicitors in Belfast are here to help you seek the compensation you deserve.

 

Common Causes of Cycling Accidents in Belfast and NI

 

Cycling accidents in Northern Ireland can occur in various circumstances—during daily commutes, weekend rides, or even organised cycling events. Some of the most common accidents that we see arise from:

  • Car door collisions – when a driver opens their door without checking for oncoming cyclists
  • Overtaking accidents – where a vehicle passes too closely
  • Careless or distracted driving form other road users
  • Animals straying onto the road

If you’ve been injured due to any of the above, you may be entitled to compensation for your cycling accident.

 

Common Types of Cycling Accident Injury

 

Cyclists often sustain serious and long-lasting injuries when involved in road accidents. Some of the most common injuries include:

  • Traumatic brain injuries (TBI)
  • Spinal cord injuries
  • Facial injuries and dental trauma
  • Broken bones and dislocations
  • Road rash and severe abrasions
  • Soft tissue injuries
  • Amputations

In addition to physical trauma, many cyclists also suffer from psychological injuries such as PTSD, anxiety, or depression following a crash. At Lacey Solicitors, we understand the full scope of these injuries and can help you claim compensation for both physical and emotional suffering.

You can learn more about bringing a claim for compensation for psychological trauma courtesy of Lacey Solicitors Firm.

 

Eligibility to Make a Personal Injury Compensation Claim After an Accident

 

If you were injured in an accident on your bicycle and it was not your fault, then you may be eligible. You can also claim compensation after a bike accident for a family member either due to their inability to do so due to injuries, their lack of mental capacity, or if they are a minor.

 

Is there a time limit on making a claim after a cycling accident in NI?

 

In Northern Ireland, you typically have three years from the date of your accident to begin legal proceedings. For minors, the three-year time limit starts from their 18th birthday.

Don’t delay—early legal advice can make a big difference in the success of your claim.

 

What is the Process for Making a Cycling Accident Injury Claim in Northern Ireland?

 

If you’ve been injured in a cycling accident, the first step is to contact Lacey Solicitors. We’ll arrange a consultation and begin gathering the necessary details to support your case.

You’ll likely need a medical assessment to confirm the extent of your injuries. From there, we’ll handle all legal aspects of the process, including:

  • Collecting evidence
  • Communicating with insurers
  • Negotiating a fair settlement

Our goal is to secure the maximum compensation available for your injury and loss.

 

How Much Could a Compensation Claim for a Cycling Injury in NI be Worth?

 

The value of your claim depends on several factors, including:

  • The severity of your injuries
  • The impact on your daily life and work
  • Medical expenses and ongoing care costs
  • Loss of earnings
  • Pain and suffering (physical and emotional)

While every case is unique, Lacey Solicitors previously secured €580,000 in compensation for a client who suffered life-changing leg injuries in a cycling incident. We will ensure you receive the compensation you rightfully deserve.

 

Contact Lacey Solicitors – Belfast’s Trusted Cycling Injury Lawyers

 

If you’ve been injured in a cycling accident anywhere in Ireland or Northern Ireland, Lacey Solicitors Dublin & Belfast is here to help. Our dedicated team of personal injury lawyers has the experience and local knowledge needed to handle your claim with care and expertise.

 

Let us help you get the justice—and compensation—you deserve.

 

Accidents in the Workplace: Construction Work Injuries in Northern Ireland

Construction sites are some of the most hazardous workplaces in Northern Ireland. With the constant use of heavy machinery, working at heights, and potential exposure to hazardous substances, it’s no surprise that serious accidents can and do happen. If you or a loved one has suffered an injury on a construction site, Lacey Solicitors are here to help you claim the compensation you deserve.

 

How Common are Construction Injuries?

 

According to the Health and Safety Executive of Northern Ireland (HSENI), there have been 46 construction site fatalities in the last decade alone. Despite rigorous health and safety regulations, construction workers still face unacceptable levels of risk due to:

  • Inadequate risk assessments
  • Poor site maintenance
  • Lack of training or PPE
  • Exposure to hazardous materials
  • Working at heights without proper fall prevention measures

At Lacey Solicitors, our expert personal injury team in Belfast have decades of experience in helping construction workers bring successful compensation claims against employers or third parties who have failed in their duty of care.

 

What is the Most Common Injury Suffered by Construction Workers?

 

Construction workers such as labourers, electricians, roofers, bricklayers, and plasterers are regularly exposed to injury risks. Common types of construction site injuries include:

  • Falls from height (scaffolding, roofs, ladders)
  • Slips, trips, and falls as outlined in our previous article.
  • Crush injuries from heavy machinery
  • Electrocution or burns from faulty wiring or equipment
  • Head and brain injuries from falling objects
  • Repetitive strain injuries (RSI) or vibration white finger
  • Respiratory illnesses like asbestosis and silicosis
  • Hearing loss from prolonged exposure to loud machinery

If you’ve experienced any of the above while working on a construction site, you may be entitled to compensation. Lacey Solicitors can guide you through every step of the claims process.  Read about Gerard from Belfast and his construction accident in Galway where he fell from a scaffolding.

 

Vicarious Liability: When Employers Are Responsible for Colleague Negligence

 

You may be wondering: What if my colleague caused the accident? Under the principle of vicarious liability, your employer can still be held responsible.

 

What Is Vicarious Liability?

 

This legal concept holds an employer accountable for the negligent actions of their employees, as long as those actions occurred within the scope of employment. For example:

  • A colleague failed to follow proper safety procedures, causing your injury.
  • A subcontractor made a critical error on site.
  • You weren’t trained adequately for a high-risk task.

You don’t sue your colleague — instead, Lacey Solicitors would pursue your employer’s insurance provider to ensure you receive fair compensation.

 

Types of Claims We Handle

 

At Lacey Solicitors, we’ve helped clients across Northern Ireland claim for a range of construction accident injuries, including:

 

  • Broken or fractured bones
  • Amputation
  • Eye and hearing damage
  • Spinal cord injuries and paralysis
  • PTSD and psychological trauma
  • Occupational illnesses (e.g. asbestosis, COPD, dermatitis)
  • Fatal construction accidents

Your health, your livelihood, and your future matter. We help you seek justice and recover your financial losses following a construction injury.

 

Causes of Construction Site Accidents

 

Many construction site accidents can be traced back to a few recurring issues. These include the failure to carry out proper risk assessments, inadequate safety measures when working at heights, and the use of faulty or poorly maintained equipment. Accidents also commonly occur due to improper training or lack of supervision, as well as the absence of appropriate or functioning personal protective equipment (PPE). Exposure to hazardous substances such as asbestos or brick dust, poor traffic management involving construction vehicles, and unsafe manual handling practices further contribute to the risk. When these failures result in injury, they may form the basis for a personal injury compensation claim.

 

Making a Construction Injury Claim in Northern Ireland

 

To make a successful claim, you must prove:

  1. A duty of care existed
  2. That duty was breached
  3. The breach caused your injury

Our legal team at Lacey Solicitors has extensive experience building robust cases and negotiating with employers and insurers to achieve the best possible outcomes for our clients.

 

Bring a Claim for Compensation After a Serious Construction Accident

 

Don’t let your employer’s negligence go unanswered. If you or a loved one has been injured on a construction site, you deserve expert legal representation and full compensation for your losses.

Contact Lacey Solicitors Belfast today to start your construction site injury claim.  Call us or fill out our online enquiry form — we’re ready to help you every step of the way.

 

 

 

 

Understanding Credit Hire: A Necessary Service, But It Must Withstand Legal Scrutiny

After a car accident, one of the first concerns many drivers face is how to stay mobile. Credit hire services step into that gap, offering temporary replacement vehicles without upfront cost. But while this service is vital, credit hire claims after car accidents must also survive legal scrutiny.

At Lacey Solicitors, we understand that after a road traffic accident, access to a temporary replacement vehicle is often critical. Credit hire serves a legitimate need, particularly for innocent drivers who cannot afford to pay for a hire vehicle upfront. But for insurers, while the system is necessary, it must also be proportionate, evidence-based, and compliant with established legal principles.

Credit hire claims are often complex and legally contentious. Those in the trenches of credit hire litigation will often see the same core disputes surface time and time again. While each case depends on its own facts, several key issues consistently arise. These include:

  • Need for hire
  • Enforceability of the credit hire agreement
  • Rate of hire
  • Impecuniosity of the plaintiff
  • Duration of hire
  • General mitigation of loss

While future articles will explore enforceability of hire agreements and general mitigation arguments in more depth, this article focuses on the four most frequently contested aspects of credit hire claims: need, duration, rate, and impecuniosity.


What is Credit Hire?

Credit hire involves the provision of a like-for-like replacement vehicle by an accident management company to a non-fault driver. The cost is not paid upfront by the driver but is instead recovered from the at-fault party’s insurer.

This model has been recognised judicially as fulfilling a real societal need. In Dimond v Lovell [2000] 2 All ER 897, Lord Nicholls described credit hire as meeting a “real need” and Lord Hobhouse acknowledged its “understandable popularity.” However, their Lordships also warned that such claims must be justified under the principles of mitigation and reasonableness.


Key Legal Issues for Credit Hire Claims After Car Accidents

 

1. Need

A claimant must show a genuine need for a replacement vehicle. This is often the first and most fundamental issue considered in credit hire litigation.

Courts will evaluate whether:

  • The claimant required a vehicle at all during the hire period
  • The vehicle hired was appropriate for their circumstances
  • Reasonable alternatives, such as public transport or a household vehicle, were available

Evidence such as daily mileage, access to other vehicles, work-related travel, family commitments, and geographical access to transport services is often decisive. If the need is not clearly established, the entire hire claim can collapse.

2. Duration

Even if need is proven, the length of the hire must be reasonable and justifiable.

Arguably, delays in repairs, inspections, acceptance of a pre-accident value (PAV) offer and ‘off hiring’ can undermine a claim—especially where those delays are attributable to the claimant or their representatives. The principle of mitigation of loss, as highlighted in Giles v Thompson [1994] 1 AC 142, remains crucial: claimants must take reasonable steps to keep their losses to a minimum.

If unnecessary delays occur, insurers will quite rightly look to dispute part or all of the hire duration.

3. Rate

In credit hire cases, one of the key issues often contested is the hire rate claimed. Courts generally award basic hire rates (BHR) unless the claimant can demonstrate impecuniosity—meaning they could not afford to pay for the vehicle hire upfront—in which case full credit hire rates may be allowed.

However, if the defendant does not provide evidence of BHR, courts may by default award credit hire rates even if impecuniosity is not proven. This places an important evidential burden on defendants to produce credible BHR evidence to challenge higher credit hire charges. Without such evidence, the court has limited means to assess whether the credit hire rates claimed are reasonable compared to market rates.

When courts do consider BHR, they look for the lowest reasonable rates available from mainstream or reputable local suppliers in the claimant’s geographical area. The assessment is fact-sensitive and courts generally avoid overly technical disputes about exact pricing, focusing instead on a reasonable approximation of market rates as seen in Stevens v Equity Syndicate Management Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 93. Additionally, if credit hire agreements include extras such as “nil excess” cover that basic hire rates do not provide or provide inadequately, the court may treat these costs separately and allow appropriate adjustments. Overall, rate challenges aim to ensure claims reflect fair market costs rather than inflated charges, balancing the claimant’s legitimate needs against the defendant’s right to avoid overpayment.

Claimants are generally only entitled to recover the Basic Hire Rate (BHR) unless they can establish ‘impecuniosity.’

4. Impecuniosity

Impecuniosity, a pivotal issue in credit hire claims, refers to a claimant’s inability to afford upfront car hire charges following an accident. It forms part of the broader duty to mitigate losses—a principle that claimants must act reasonably to limit financial damage. Courts have established that where a claimant cannot afford to hire a vehicle without making unreasonable sacrifices, credit hire charges may be recoverable.

As outlined in South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust v Flannagan and Capper Trading Ltd [2015] NIQB 30, Horner J explained:

“An individual who is not penniless can still be impecunious, because as a question of priorities he is unable to pay car hire charges without making sacrifices he could not reasonably be expected to make.”

Key case law, including Lagden v O’Connor and Zurich Insurance Plc v Umerji, illustrates that impecuniosity not only impacts the rate of hire but also the duration. The burden initially lies with the claimant to prove their financial position, and once sufficient evidence is provided, the evidential burden shifts to the defendant.

The assessment of hire charges and duration differs based on whether the claimant is impecunious. If so, they may claim the full credit hire rate and extend the hire period until the defendant provides compensation for repairs or vehicle replacement. For pecunious claimants, courts consider what is reasonable under the circumstances, such as waiting for an engineer’s report or the defendant’s inspection. In cases where repairs or replacements are delayed without justification, courts assess the claimant’s efforts to mitigate losses. Ultimately, reasonable conduct, timely communication, and evidence of financial status are central to determining recoverable credit hire damages.

Courts expect robust documentary evidence—bank statements, income proof, credit history, and essential outgoings—to support any claim of impecuniosity. Vague assertions or anecdotal claims won’t meet the required threshold.


Real-World Case: High Charges, But Still Recoverable?

A recent example reported by the BBC involved a nurse who was charged £50,000 for hiring a Tesla Model 3 for over three months. While the judge acknowledged that the hire costs were three times higher than standard and the hire period 75 days longer than necessary, he still ruled that the insurer was liable for the full amount.

The reasoning was based on the fact that the claimant followed her employer’s fleet management advice and acted in good faith. While the result may appear controversial, it highlights how the factual context and procedural conduct of the parties can significantly influence judicial outcomes—even where rate and duration are contentious.


Industry Improvements for Credit Hire Claims After Car Accidents

Not all credit hire claims are problematic. In fact, recent industry data suggests that:

  • Average hire durations are decreasing
  • Legal costs associated with credit hire have dropped by nearly 50% since 2023

This reflects greater cooperation between insurers, defendant law firms, and accident management companies. However, careful legal oversight remains essential.


Conclusion: Necessary Service, But Not a Carte Blanche

Credit hire is necessary and beneficial—but it must be fair, reasonable, and subject to evidential and legal discipline. Defence solicitors and insurers have a duty to:

  • Insist on proper proof of rate, need, and duration
  • Demand full impecuniosity disclosure where higher-than-market rates are claimed
  • Resist excessive or unjustified claims, while still acting proportionately and fairly

At Lacey Solicitors, we are uniquely positioned to assist clients—whether insurers, fleet managers, or individuals—with the nuances of credit hire claims after car accidents. With a deep understanding of both claimant and defence perspectives, we provide balanced, evidence-based legal strategies in this ever-evolving area of personal injury law.

📞 Need advice or representation in a credit hire dispute? Contact Lacey Solicitors today.

No Win, No Fee Solicitors in Northern Ireland: What You Need to Know

If you’re researching no win, no fee solicitors in Belfast or Northern Ireland, it’s crucial to understand the legal landscape. While these agreements are commonly promoted in England and Wales, they are illegal in Northern Ireland. At Lacey Solicitors, we offer ethical, transparent alternatives that help our clients secure maximum compensation.

What Is a “No Win, No Fee” Agreement?

A no win, no fee agreement, also known as a conditional fee arrangement, allows clients to pursue legal claims without upfront legal costs. Often, if successful, a solicitor takes a percentage (usually up to 25%) of the awarded compensation as a success fee. If the case fails, the client pays nothing.

These arrangements are often used in:

  • Personal injury claims

  • Road traffic accidents

  • Medical negligence

Although this model is widespread in England and Wales, no win, no fee is strictly prohibited by the Law Society of Northern Ireland.


Why Is No Win, No Fee Illegal in Northern Ireland?

Part V of the Solicitors (Northern Ireland) Order 1976 explicitly bans any solicitor from charging fees solely dependent on the success of a claim. As such, no win, no fee arrangements are illegal in Northern Ireland. The Law Society of Northern Ireland strictly enforces this rule.

If a solicitor in Belfast or anywhere in Northern Ireland offers you a no win, no fee agreement, you should be aware that they are acting outside the law. We advise reporting any such behaviour to the Law Society by filling in a complaint form on their website.


Ethical Alternatives to No Win, No Fee at Lacey Solicitors

At Lacey Solicitors, we don’t take a percentage of your damages. We believe you deserve to keep 100% of the compensation you’re awarded. Instead of illegal fee structures, we offer clear, legal funding options that provide access to justice without financial stress.

✔ Free Initial Consultation

Start your claim with a free, no-obligation consultation. We’ll assess your case, advise you on your legal position, and present your options — all at no cost.

✔ Out-of-Court Settlements

We successfully settle the majority of cases without going to court. In most cases, your legal fees are paid by the other party’s insurance if the claim is successful.

✔ Legal Aid

In cases that do go to court, you may be eligible for legal aid to cover your legal fees. We help you determine your eligibility and guide you through the process.

✔ After the Event (ATE) Insurance

ATE insurance protects you from paying the other party’s legal costs if your case is unsuccessful. This means peace of mind at a modest premium — only if required.

✔ Legal Expenses Insurance

Many clients already have legal expenses cover through their car or home insurance. We’ll help you check your policies to see if you’re already protected.


Why Choose Lacey Solicitors?

At Lacey Solicitors, we’ve been helping clients across the entire island of Ireland, and we have built a reputation for trust, results, and ethical legal practice.

With us, you benefit from:

  • Experienced personal injury solicitors with offices in Belfast and Dublin

  • 100% compensation retained

  • Clear, transparent legal costs

  • A proven track record in road traffic accidents, workplace injuries, medical negligence, and more

  • Legal representation tailored to your financial situation

We’re here to provide access to justice — legally, ethically, and effectively.


Don’t Be Misled by No Win, No Fee Advertising

TV and online adverts from Great Britain often promote no win, no fee claims to Northern Ireland audiences. These ads are misleading. The Law Society and regulators have issued clear warnings: solicitors in Northern Ireland are not permitted to offer these arrangements.

Even in Ireland, the use of the phrases like “no win, no fee”, “no foal, no fee” and “free first consultation” are all banned, the LSRA has reiterated.

In England and Wales, the model has come under increasing scrutiny for hidden fees and unfair practices. At Lacey Solicitors, we believe there’s a better way — and our clients agree.


Speak with a Belfast Personal Injury Solicitor Today

If you’ve suffered an injury that wasn’t your fault, you don’t need to risk your compensation or be misled by complicated fee arrangements. At Lacey Solicitors, we’re committed to helping you get the justice — and the full compensation — you deserve.

📞 Call now for a free consultation or
📩 Enquire online and speak directly with a solicitor

Injured in an Accident? Don’t Let These Myths Stop You From Speaking to a Personal Injury Lawyer

At Lacey Solicitors, we’ve helped countless individuals across Belfast and Northern Ireland get the compensation they deserve after suffering injuries that were not their fault. But too often, myths, misconceptions and misinformation prevent people from even speaking to a personal injury lawyer.

In this post, we break down the 10 most common personal injury myths, explain the truth behind them, and show how our team of experienced solicitors can support you every step of the way.


1. “I Feel Embarrassed About Claiming Compensation”

Media headlines and phrases such as “compensation culture” have made many people feel ashamed about making a legitimate claim. But if you’ve been injured through no fault of your own, you have a legal right to be compensated.

Lord Dyson, the third most senior judge in England and Wales, has dismissed the existence of a compensation culture in the UK as a false perception and a “media-created myth.”

Professor Lofsted, who was also asked to review the issue by the UK Government stated in his report “The „compensation culture‟ (or the perception of it) in the UK has been the subject of several reviews over the last few years,, but no evidence has been presented for its existence”.

Some individuals may seek damages to which they are not entitled, but this is not unique to personal injury law and is true of any area of legal practice.   Fraudulent claims are very much the exception to the rule and far outweighed in number by genuine personal injury claims made by honest people.

At Lacey Solicitors, we regularly see clients who minimise their injuries out of fear of judgment. We’re here to remind you that seeking justice is not something to feel guilty about—it’s your right.


2. “Personal Injury Claims Are Only for Serious Accidents”

It’s a myth that you can only claim for life-altering or catastrophic injuries. The truth is, you may be entitled to compensation for a wide range of injuries—including whiplash, soft-tissue damage, or a slip and fall—as long as someone else was responsible.

Even minor injuries can lead to lost income, medical expenses, and long-term discomfort, and you shouldn’t bear that burden if the accident was not your fault.


3. “My Medical History Prevents Me from Claiming”

Think you can’t claim because you’ve had back problems before or made a similar claim in the past?

If your accident exacerbated an existing condition or caused new symptoms, you may still be eligible for compensation. Every case is evaluated on its individual merits, and our solicitors know how to present your medical history in a way that supports your claim.

The key is always to be up-front and honest about any relevant history.  If you fail to disclose a relevant medical history, it can prohibit you from receiving compensation.


4. “Insurers Won’t Believe Me—Especially After a Low-Speed Collision”

Many insurers now try to avoid paying claims by arguing Low Velocity Impact (LVI) —suggesting that the accident was too minor to cause injury.  Legally speaking, a defence which asserts that the collision was a low-velocity impact is a challenge to the causation of injury.

At Lacey Solicitors, we believe in collaboration between insurers and injured victims and so we regularly see these types of arguments.  We work closely with independent leading experts to support our clients’ cases. We’ve helped many clients succeed even when insurers initially denied their claims.


5. “You Can’t Claim for Psychological Injuries”

Not all injuries are physical. Many people suffer emotional or psychological trauma—such as anxiety, PTSD, or stress—after an accident.

You are absolutely entitled to claim for psychological harm, and our Personal injury lawyers have successfully handled numerous cases where these types of injuries were the main focus. We work with medical professionals to provide the evidence needed to support your case.


6. “Personal Injury Claims Take Years to Settle”

While some complex cases can take longer, many personal injury claims in Northern Ireland are resolved in a matter of months, especially when liability is clear and medical evidence is straightforward.

Lacey Solicitors is committed to handling your claim efficiently and keeping you updated throughout the process to minimise stress and delays.


7. “I Don’t Need a Solicitor for a Small Claim”

Even if your injury seems minor, you should always speak to a solicitor before accepting any settlement. Insurance companies may offer a quick payout, but it may not reflect the true cost of your recovery.

We help you calculate the full impact of your injury—including time off work, ongoing treatment, and emotional trauma—to ensure you receive fair compensation.


8. “The Process Is Too Complicated for Me to Handle”

The legal system can feel overwhelming, especially after an accident. But that’s where we come in.

From the moment you contact Lacey Solicitors, we handle everything—from gathering evidence and dealing with insurers to negotiating your settlement—so you can focus on recovering.


9. “It’s Too Expensive to Make a Personal Injury Claim”

Many people are put off by the fear of legal costs, but at Lacey Solicitors, our solicitors are committed to being transparent about all costs and legal fees. We believe there are better, more ethical alternatives to no win, no fee agreements, (which are illegal in Northern Ireland) which will give you the legal support you need no matter what your financial circumstances.

This starts with a free initial consultation. We will listen to your situation, offer legal advice on whether your claim is viable and present you with possible options for proceeding — free of charge. If you decide to start a claim, we will use a range of options to maximise the compensation you receive and minimise your legal fees.


10. “I Can’t Claim If I Was Partially at Fault”

Even if you were partly responsible for the accident—such as not wearing a seatbelt or crossing the road outside a pedestrian crossing—you may still be entitled to compensation under contributory negligence laws in Northern Ireland.

Your compensation may be reduced depending on your level of responsibility, but it does not prevent you from making a claim. We’ll work with you to make sure your role is fairly represented and your rights are protected.


Bonus Tip: Photos Can Make or Break Your Personal Injury Lawyers Case

If you’re in an accident, use your smartphone or dashcam to photograph:

  • The vehicles involved

  • Road conditions and street signs

  • Your injuries (if visible)

  • The overall scene

This kind of visual evidence can significantly strengthen your case and help establish liability early in the process.


Need Advice? Speak to Belfast’s Trusted Personal Injury Lawyers

With decades of experience helping clients throughout Northern Ireland, Personal Injury Lawyers, Lacey Solicitors, are here to help you understand your rights and get the compensation you deserve.

📞 Call us today on 028 90896540
📧 Or email us at info@laceysolicitors.com
📍 Visit our office in Belfast or Dublin for a free, no-obligation consultation

Don’t let fear or misinformation stop you. Our Personal Injury Lawyers are here to support you—start your claim with confidence.

Lacey Solicitors Finalists in Four Major Categories at the 2025 LEAP Irish Law Awards

Lacey Solicitors, a prominent insurance and litigation law firm with offices in Belfast and Dublin, has been named as a finalist in four distinguished categories at the 2025 LEAP Irish Law Awards. These nominations affirm the firm’s commitment to delivering high-quality legal representation and reinforce its reputation as one of the most respected law firms in Ireland and Northern Ireland.

As one of the most competitive years on record, the Irish Law Awards continue to spotlight the finest legal talent across the island of Ireland.  A full list of finalists for each category can be found here.  Lacey Solicitors’ recognition across multiple categories cements its position as a legal leader in insurance litigation and personal injury law.


Lacey Solicitors – 2025 Irish Law Awards Finalists

1. Civil Litigation Firm of the Year

Recognised as a top-tier civil litigation law firm in Ireland, Lacey Solicitors has demonstrated exceptional skill in managing complex insurance disputes. The firm’s civil litigation solicitors in both Belfast and Dublin are known for their strategic approach, dedication to client outcomes, and courtroom expertise.

2. Excellence & Innovation in Client Services

This category acknowledges Lacey Solicitors’ unwavering focus on client satisfaction, innovation, and use of legal technology. Their commitment to LEXCEL means a responsive, client-centred service across all departments — from cross-border insurance litigation to complex property disputes.

3. William Wilson – Property Lawyer of the Year (Finalist)

William Wilson, a senior solicitor at the firm, has been recognised for his outstanding work in property law across Northern Ireland. From residential purchases to commercial property transactions, his experience and professionalism make him a trusted legal advisor for both individuals and businesses.

4. Ruaidhri Austin – Personal Injury Lawyer of the Year (Finalist)

Ruaidhri Austin has been shortlisted for his excellence in personal injury law in Ireland and Northern Ireland.  He has been recognised for combining a defence background with a passion for securing justice for innocent victims and is a respected campaigner for cross‑sector collaboration to ensure fair outcomes for all.


Belfast and Dublin Solicitors Celebrated for Legal Excellence

Lacey Solicitors’ recognition at the LEAP Irish Law Awards 2025 underscores its continuing reputation as a leading provider of legal insurance services in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. With offices in Belfast and Dublin, the firm continues to deliver outstanding results across key practice areas:

“We are incredibly proud to be finalists in four prestigious categories this year. Our team works tirelessly to deliver exceptional legal service, and we’re particularly pleased to see William Wilson and Ruaidhrí Austin recognised for their dedication and expertise,” said Terry Lacey, Senior Partner.


About Lacey Solicitors – Insurance and Injury Litigation Experts

With decades of combined legal experience, Lacey Solicitors offers comprehensive legal solutions from strategically located offices in Belfast and Dublin. The firm is known for:

  • Expert legal advice tailored to client’s needs

  • A results-driven approach to litigation

  • Deep experience in insurance claims, civil disputes, and property transactions

  • A strong cross-border presence for clients operating in both jurisdictions


Contact Lacey Solicitors – Belfast & Dublin Offices

Looking for expert legal representation in civil litigation, insurance law, personal injury, or property law in Ireland? Contact Lacey Solicitors today using our online contact page.

Court of Appeal in Ireland Clarifies Application of District Court Costs Scale in Personal Injury Litigation

Important Developments for Insurance Defence Practitioners and the District Court Costs Scale Following Nolan v. County Registrar (IECA, 2025)


The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Kevin Nolan v. County Registrar for the County of Waterford & Ors. [2025] IECA 110 offers significant clarification on the legal treatment of costs in personal injury litigation where proceedings are brought in the Circuit Court but damages ultimately fall within the jurisdiction of the District Court.

This judgment will be of particular interest to insurers and defence solicitors dealing with District Court personal injury claims. It underscores the principle that parties who choose to litigate in a higher court bear the risk of recovering only lower jurisdictional costs if their award does not justify the forum.


Case Background

Kevin Nolan suffered a personal injury while walking along a public footpath in Dungarvan in April 2018. Proceedings were issued in the Circuit Court against multiple defendants, including Waterford City and County Council, KC Cable Vision Ltd, and Virgin Media. After a fully contested hearing, he was awarded €8,000 in damages — a figure well within the jurisdiction of the District Court. A differential costs order was made, awarding Nolan costs on the District Court scale.

Despite the scale order, Nolan’s legal team submitted a bill of costs amounting to €32,986.89. The County Registrar allowed costs of €8,755.78, applying the District Court scale. This sparked judicial review proceedings in which Nolan challenged the legality of the scale, the Registrar’s application of it, and broader issues relating to legal costs regulation.


Main Issues on Appeal

There were four core issues considered by the Court of Appeal:

  1. Whether the District Court scale of costs unlawfully restricted recoverable costs under s.17(4) of the Courts Act 1981.

  2. Whether the County Registrar had failed to discharge his duty under s.141 of the Legal Services Regulation Act 2015.

  3. Whether the scale and relevant rules were ultra vires the District Court Rules Committee.

  4. Whether the appellant’s constitutional right of access to the courts had been breached.


Findings of the Court

1. District Court Scale Is Lawful and Proportionate
The Court upheld the validity of the District Court scale of costs, affirming the High Court’s interpretation. It accepted that fixing costs for the “doing of a specified thing in a particular form of action” — such as obtaining a judgment in a defended claim — was permissible under s.17(4). The Court reaffirmed the legislative policy underpinning differential costs orders: to ensure proportionality between the amount of damages awarded and the legal costs incurred, and to promote litigation in the appropriate jurisdiction.

This decision is a strong endorsement of the cost-efficiency principle long recognised in Irish personal injury litigation. The Court noted that proceedings brought unnecessarily in a higher court place undue cost burdens on defendants and the justice system, and that rules like the District Court scale help prevent this.

2. Breach of Statutory Duty Under s.141
Significantly, the Court found that the County Registrar failed to comply with s.141 of the Legal Services Regulation Act 2015. That section obliges a County Registrar, when taxing costs, to have regard to the reasonableness principles set out in Schedule 1 of the Act. The Registrar’s decision had relied solely on the scale and made no reference to those statutory principles.

Although the point had not been raised at the adjudication hearing, the Court held that the obligation under s.141 was clear and mandatory. As such, the Registrar’s failure to apply it invalidated the adjudication. The decision was quashed and remitted.

This finding introduces a new procedural safeguard that insurance defence practitioners should be aware of, particularly in cases involving differential cost orders where District Court scales are applied by a County Registrar.

3. No Breach of Access to Justice
The Court dismissed Nolan’s claim that the operation of the costs regime infringed his constitutional right of access to the courts. He had, in fact, accessed the courts and obtained a decree. The discrepancy between the costs claimed and those awarded, in the Court’s view, did not amount to a denial of access.

Importantly, the Court also noted that Nolan had not availed of options under the rules that allow for exceptions — such as seeking increased costs due to special circumstances — and that his claim lacked evidential support.

4. District Court Rules Committee Acted Within Its Powers
Finally, the Court rejected the argument that Order 53 of the District Court Rules and the associated costs schedule were ultra vires the rule-making powers granted under s.91 of the Courts of Justice Act 1924. The rules were found to fall squarely within the scope of “practice and procedure” and “questions of costs,” and did not intrude upon legislative functions reserved to the Oireachtas.

The Court distinguished the facts from those in DPP v. McGrath, where a rule completely precluding recovery of costs was struck down as a policy choice outside the scope of the Rules Committee. In contrast, the District Court scale provides for costs recovery, includes exceptions for special circumstances, and is subject to regular review.


Practical Implications for Insurers and Defence Lawyers

This judgment reinforces the existing framework around differential costs and confirms the limited recoverability of legal costs when proceedings are brought in a higher jurisdiction unnecessarily.

  • Forum Selection Remains Crucial
    Plaintiffs who issue in the Circuit Court when the District Court is appropriate may face cost consequences, even if successful. Defence teams should continue to challenge jurisdiction early and flag cost exposure where possible.

  • Emphasis on Cost Proportionality
    The Court’s interpretation of s.17(4) strengthens the rationale that costs must be proportionate to the level of damages. It gives further support to insurers resisting inflated costs claims where damages are modest.

  • Challenges to the District Court Costs Scale Unlikely to Succeed
    The Court has made clear that the District Court Costs Scale is legally sound and within the authority of the Rules Committee. Arguments that the scale unlawfully restricts access to justice or oversteps its mandate are unlikely to gain traction in future.


Conclusion

This case provides helpful clarification for practitioners and insurers alike. It confirms the continuing validity of the District Court Costs Scale in the context of differential costs orders, while also reinforcing that County Registrars must apply the legal cost assessment principles set out in the 2015 Act. The ruling strikes a balance between efficiency in legal proceedings and statutory fairness in cost adjudications — and is likely to be cited in many cost disputes going forward.

Should you require any further information on legal costs in Ireland, use our online contact portal to speak to a member of the team.

Sunshine Causes Havoc for Drivers in NI

Personal injuries in Northern Ireland do not subside when the weather turns pleasant. When it comes to traffic collisions, the sun’s rays can cause more harm than good. This article details common causes of RTAs in excessive sunshine.

 

Strong Sunshine Poses a High Serious Accident Rate

 

When we think of adverse weather conditions which impact our ability to drive, we do not think of sunshine. We think of rain, snow, and ice. However, sunshine causes glare on both wet and dry roads. The sun shining in a driver’s eyes is responsible for a large increase in serious accident rates when compared to plainer weather.

This study in the Wolters Kluwer Medicine Journal shows that the risk of accidents and injuries in bright sunlight is significantly increased. In fact, fatal and serious accidents can be as much as 16% more likely in sunny weather than in cloudy weather.

Another source, Belfast Live via Road Safety GB, attributes over 33,000 casualties on Northern Ireland’s roads to strong sunshine during the decade proceeding 2021. 24% of those were serious accidents and 19 people died as a result.

If you have become injured in a road traffic accident caused by the sun’s glare and you live in Northern Ireland, you can contact Lacey Solicitors Firm for help. We can offer expert advice and representation as we bring your personal injury claim to the responsible parties.

 

The Sun’s Glare is a Year-Round Threat to Drivers

 

Whether you are a victim of the low winter sun or the high early afternoon sunshine of mid-summer, the sun’s glare is a threat all year round.

Reasons accidents can be more severe during sunny days include:

  •       When the sun is out, drivers find it harder to see signs or traffic signals.
  •       Drivers facing the sun are less alert to potentially dangerous conditions.
  •       Reflections and glare can cause accidents or optical illusions.
  •     The average drink driver is more likely to consume alcohol on a sunny day.
  •     Clear, blue skies create a false sense of security in the road ahead. Speeding is therefore more likely on these days.

 

Tips to Drive Safely on Sunny Days

 

There are many ways in which you can drive safely on sunny days, either as an individual driver or as a business/fleet owner. Safety tips include using anti-glare film on windscreens, using sunglasses even in winter, and pulling over to the side of the road when you cannot see because of the sun’s glare.

 

How to Claim Compensation After a Car Accident in the Sun

 

If you become injured during a road traffic accident caused by the low winter sun, you could bring a claim for compensation. If the accident was not your fault and you have enough evidence to support your case, then you should speak to one of the expert solicitors at Lacey Solicitors Firm.

If you were the driver, passenger, or pedestrian in a car accident, it is important to seek legal advice to proceed with a compensation claim. Use our online form to contact us today to find out how much your claim could be worth.