In Fanning v Myerscough & Anor [2012] IEHC 128, the plaintiff, Mr. Fanning, sustained a serious foot injury while alighting from a tractor during his employment at Baroda Stud. The tractor’s door swung open unexpectedly, causing him to lose balance and fall. The court found that the tractor’s restraining strut was defective, breaching the employer’s statutory duty to maintain safe equipment.


Legal Considerations for Insurance Defence Solicitors in Ireland

 

1. Breach of Statutory Duty

The court established that the employer failed to maintain the tractor’s restraining strut, constituting a breach of statutory duty. This finding underscores the importance for insurers to assess whether statutory obligations have been met in workplace safety matters.

2. Contributory Negligence

The court assessed contributory negligence at 50%, noting that while the employer breached statutory duty, the plaintiff’s own actions contributed significantly to the accident. This highlights the potential for substantial mitigation of liability when employee conduct is a contributing factor.

3. Causation and Injury Assessment

The court accepted expert evidence linking the plaintiff’s injury to the accident, despite the presence of an underlying vascular condition. This reinforces the need for comprehensive medical evaluations to establish clear causation in injury claims.


Implications for Insurance Defence Lawyers in Ireland

 

  • Documentation of Safety Measures: Insurers should ensure that employers maintain thorough records of equipment maintenance and safety protocols to defend against claims of statutory breaches.

  • Investigation of Employee Conduct: A detailed investigation into the employee’s actions leading up to the incident can provide grounds for asserting contributory negligence and reducing liability.

  • Expert Medical Testimony: Engaging medical experts to assess the extent of injuries and their connection to the accident is crucial in disputing exaggerated claims.


Conclusion

 

The Fanning v Myerscough & Anor case serves as a pertinent example for insurance defence professionals, illustrating how contributory negligence can significantly impact the outcome of Employers’ Liability claims. By focusing on the interplay between statutory duties and employee conduct, insurers can develop more effective defence strategies in similar cases.  For more information or to discuss any Employers Liabilty matter, contact us using our secure online portal.

HEAR BACK FROM A SOLICITOR WITHIN 24 HOURS

    Submit